Hello on this Sunday morning here
in Missouri—a morning that reminds me of autumn in Minnesota. The hot-tempered
weather has cooled off: a good day for writing.
Many
of you wished me abundant sales at the fair last Sunday. So you may be as
disappointed as I was to have sold only two books. But that fact has a flip
side: I met several vendors who gave me ideas for other local fairs, like those
held in hospitals and schools. So now I have some research to do.
In
2011, the trade paperback publisher of A
Cat’s Life: Dulcy’s Story sent me the final 600 copies of the out-of-print
book for the price of shipping. I still have 400 copies in the garage. That’s a
lot of fairs, folks!
Now
to the present.
I
spent the past week critiquing a manuscript for a first-time novelist. Back in
July, I’d done the same. After that reading I encouraged her “to situate” her
scenes by providing details so that readers could visualize where something was
happening. I also recommended the use of detail when writing dialogue so that “talking
heads” would not confuse readers.
The
author sent the manuscript back to me for review in early September. As often
happens, in an attempt to show facial expressions and body language, she had
added too many details. Moreover, the timeline was confusing, and in at least
one crucial scene she missed the opportunity to create drama.
I
completed my reading, critiquing, and slight copyediting on Thursday. The next
day, she and I went through the manuscript on the phone for 3 ½ hours. I
explained what still needed to be done—most of which could be accomplished by
the deletion of words and the condensing of some scenes. Having words to cut is
always easier than having to add words.
Because
this is a young adult novel, it is supposed to be only about 75,000 words. The
present manuscript has over 100,000. So the author welcomed the cutting I
suggested.
As
we’ve worked together in July and again this month, I’ve come to admire her
dedication and maturity as a writer. She’s committed, open to advice, and
professional enough to take those recommendations that work for her and to
discard the rest.
She
also has a reserve of fortitude and tenacity—necessary virtues when seeking
publication. In recent weeks, she’s persevered and sent out eighty-five query
letters to agents. Yes—85. Two have asked to see her manuscript.
I
don’t know how you are responding to that ratio, but I’m impressed. Getting an
agent is so difficult today and two of those eighty-five intermediaries between
author and editor have asked to see her completed novel. That’s great news.
She
plans to do the cutting and have the manuscript ready to send out by early
October. I’m so hoping that one of those two agents will want to represent her
writing.
Having
completed that project, I’m now going to return to my own query letters to agents. The
book 2013 Guide to Literary Agents
lists 104 agents who represent historical novels. I have my query
letter ready; I’ve visited agent websites; I’ve selected the first few to whom
to send a query. Now the journey begins.
This
week I hope to contact several agents to seek their representation of The Reluctant Spy. Start visualizing!
Peace.
_-_James_Tissot_-_overall.jpg)
